If an enemy saw a fort with a garrison that probably cost a whole bunch to maintain. eh? And a fortified stance would be more effective since you could be a threat in the general region, or patrol it, or what not. Thing is, that's pretty similar to a fortified stance, I'd imagine. Maybe let the WoC construct walled chaos fortresses though. So maybe instead of an actual walled Fort we could get an unwalled outpost. True they do want to limit the number of siege battles (thank god). Though, I suppose, they could also do a 'if you fortify stance on top of a formerly walled settlement you defend that settlement.' You could, but consider how they're doing sieges. There's multiple ways they could approach the idea. With limited, mainly military building options. Well I was thinking more of like a castle from med 2. Though I suppose if you don't have a Lord for it that might not work, but you probably will. Just get a small army, march it over there, and put it in some kind of fortify stance (if you have it). I've yet to hear any opposition to this proposal. 2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of BritanniaĪll we need for the perfect compromise is some form of fort/outpost system, where you can establish a presence even in distant or lore unfriendly lands.844 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.
